The Strange Strange Ways of the Pseudo-Secularists in India

By S. P. Attri (USA)

1.   Every society has people in it who confuse armed might with culture. They go into wool-gathering and start postulating suppositions that superior might means superior culture. Noticing the unimportance of their own position, they start feeling sorry for themselves and take to despising their own culture, which they regard as inferior compared to the culture of the conqueror.

Pulverized and crushed in spirit and fortitude, they start picking up the ways of the conquerors, imitating them to give themselves a shot of badly-needed self-confidence. After relegating their culture to the ditch in this culture- demoting process, they start noticing the short-comings of their own culture and begin finding fault with every thing that they have inherited from their forefathers. Feeling shrunken in stature compared to the conquerors, they try to tie-together with every group or force that is out to undermine their ancestral culture. They even begin to wonder if they have been worshipping the wrong gods and begin to further lose touch with their own native culture.

As more and more people join in to imitate the culture of the conqueror, the culture of the conqueror becomes a sanctioned virtue, and this method of culture pick-up by imitation, proves more effective than even indoctrination by the conqueror. By and large, such people lack the moral courage to persist and stick it out, traits that are needed to overcome the difficulties.

2. We Hindus have had more than our fair share of such self-alienated Hindus. Such self-alienated and estranged Hindus are born as Hindus but become ashamed of belonging to the Hindu Society, they want to disown it and set themselves up psychologically against it. They want to hide the truth of their own culture and want to display the insidious colors of their adopted culture, the culture of the conqueror. They are the greatest friends of the conquerors. These self-alienated Hindus bear a deep inferiority complex for Hinduism tete- e-tete Islam, Christianity, and the High-Tech West.

3. The problem of self-alienated Hindus is not new at all. We have had them during the regimes of the Moslem kings. In the days of the Moslem kings, these estranged Hindus indulged in reveries and confused the superiority of the Moslem might with the superiority of the Islamic culture. These bewildered, self-estranged Hindus muddled their way through life with any thought of their own culture completely put out of their mind.

Then when the British came, these self-alienated Hindus exchanged masters, replacing Moslems with the British, and continued their dishonorable, pre- conceived, anti-Hindu bias from the Moslem period on into the period of the British regime. They now wrapped themselves in the culture of the Victorious British and started cultivating the methods and mores of the Victor British. British manners and procedures became the object of their admiration and anything with the label of the "Mighty British" became the vanguard of their prized designation and dispensation.

4. Because of the background of history, the self-alienation of these Hindus has been a double-dose of hate-Hindu historical process. Napping and dreaming always in the culture of the conqueror, in time a whole class of self- alienated (The Phony-Liberal) Hindus grew up. Molded into the garb of the Western culture, individuals like Nehru and other Brown Sahibs (nick-name for The Phony-Liberal Hindus) tried their darnest best, with delirium and delight, to put Hinduism down, and squash and smash its backbone. The Brown Sahibs did this indecorous and depraved act with the help of the minorities, in the name and guise of uplifting the minorities, and creating more minorities in the process. The objective of this minority-ism, of course, was to fluster and fragment the Hindu Society, and to subvert and smash every symbol of Hindu Culture, all in the name of protecting the minorities. Consequently, therefore, malignant and malicious propaganda was coined and conducted, to make Hindus look like monsters who are out to demolish and decimate the minorities, if permitted to do so. Blaming Hindus for everything that went wrong in India, became the device and draft of Indians like Nehru and his Phony-Liberal Cohorts, the Brown Sahibs.

The Brown Sahibs have become aliens within their own Hindu culture, a culture on which they heap filth. It is because of the ponderous appeasement of the Moslem and Christian minorities by the Brown Sahibs, that the barbaric creeds of Islam and Christianity have become so aggressive in India and they refuse to peacefully live and co-exist with the Peace-loving Hindu.

5. Things have gone so bad that being anti-Hindu is now considered by the Brown Sahibs as being Truly Secular. Using this degraded form of definition of Secularism, they make a resolute attempt to denigrate India's national Vedic culture and its ancient heritage. For instance, Sanskrit is belittled as Hindu & Brahminical and its teaching is considered the same as wearing away the base of Secularism. By thus associating Sanskrit with Brahminism, Sanskrit is given a black eye by labelling it as caste-ist and is rejected on those grounds. Along with the Sanskrit, the shouting brigade of the pseudo-secularists relegates the Vedas, the Upanishads, Purans, and other Sanskrit literature also to the ditch. In short, what the pseudo-secular crowd (The Brown Sahibs) is saying is that the proper place for our Vedic culture and literature is in the garbage can.

Teaching of Sanskrit is also objected to by Moslems (and Christians) who want to learn Arabic. But Arabic is not Indian. Sanskrit is. Also Vedas, Upanishads, Purans, are the common heritage of all Indians, Moslems and Christians included. Why should the teaching of Vedas, Upanishads, and Purana’s be discarded because the Moslems and Christians object to it? This point is particularly and potently significant because the Supreme Court has ruled that Hindutva is a way of life and is not a religion. Therefore, Vedas, Upanishads, and Purana’s have a priceless position in our heritage and they all need to be taught in all schools, to everybody.

What is the harm and what is the objection to teaching our culture to our children? Sanskrit is the gateway to all our ancient writings. It is ridiculous to insist that only Brown Sahibs have the smarts and the exclusive right to prescribe education rules for us. If Indian students are not going to learn their own culture in India, where else are they going to learn it?

6. Insult to Vedas and to Sanskrit is bad enough. Worse yet is the deliberate downgrading and denigration of goddess Saraswati which is imparted by the Brown Sahibs, in meetings in which their education ministers are present who show their uncivil and boorish behavior, by walking out. Can such people who have so much contempt for their past, be entrusted with the education of our children?

It is a dirty shame that, the greatest, the most ancient, the most perfect, and the most compatible language for computer-usage, because of being structured so rationally, the language of Sanskrit, is considered as dead by the Pseudo-Secular shouting brigade. This pseudo-secular attitude graphically demonstrates the mindless and rootless denial of Bharatiya (Indian) identity, in the name of secularism (pseudo-secularism, truthfully speaking) and it is a dramatic demonstration of how Macaulay’s ghost continues to haunt Bharat Varsha. The Spurious Secularism that is pushing the ghost of Macaulay, is Opportunistic Secularism, it is based on vote-bank politics and is afflicted with the pathology of "minority psychosis." It is the same Spurious Secularism that objects to Saraswati Vandana. If pillars of Bharatiya culture continue to be eroded and rooted out, the future generations of India will be denied their cultural heritage and the grand and golden culture of Bharat Varsha will be lost for ever.

7. What is wrong with Phony-Liberalism (Pseudo-Secularism)? What is wrong is that it is undemocratic. Democracy says that majority should rule. Hindus constitute the majority of the population in India. Then why are the Brown Sahibs afraid of Hindu education? The real cause of this sickening shame is the group of Opportunistic Secularists who want to politicise the educational system of India (to make political capital out of it), to build up their vote banks, for their ulterior, self-serving motives. There is no other rational explanation!

The Macaulay system of education presently on the books, continues to erode the confidence of the Hindu people in their own culture. In the meantime, both Islam and Christianity are tightening their noose around Hinduism in their campaign to dislodge Hinduism completely out of India. The fundamental message of Hinduism is the oneness and the underlying unities. Because of this, we must insist that we have our own Bharatiya Education System. Simply stated, we must Indianise, Nationalise, and Spiritualise our educational system and give a decent burial to the ghost of Macaulay.

8. The dirty politics of Phony-Liberalism (Pseudo-Secularism) is doing another malicious mischief; it is trying to hide the truth and substituting consistent catalogs of falsehood in its place, with the avowed objective of promoting a composite culture and encouraging a fictional Hindu-Moslem Bhai Bhai connection. NCERT and other educational bodies have issued specific instructions for the writing of history books in India, with a "Fictional Vaporisation Cleansing" statement which says that: "The period of Moslem Rule in India is not to be portrayed as a period of Conflict, Collision, Or Discord between the Hindus and the Moslems."

With this kind of Pseudo-Secular laundering of the history books of India, the Brown Sahibs are concealing the sun of truth and parading instead their substituted dark clouds of falsehood, fiction, and delusion. The dirty politicians of this Phony-Liberal Clique, will never dare tell the truth to our young Hindu boys and girls about, what kind of Barbaric Islamic Havoc their ancestors lived under during the regime of the Moslem kings in India.

What the Pseudo-Seculars are hiding from our Hindu boys and girls are the facts of certainty and the recorded facts of history that destroying other people's places of worship was a favorite pastime of practically all Moslem rulers in medieval times, and a pious performance of this pastime was provided by Prophet Hazrat Mohammad himself and the precedent had now been set in concrete. Historic chronicles narrated by the Moslem chroniclers describe clearly that Allah and his Prophet had blessed the pulling down of the Hindu temples and the raising of mosques in their places, mostly with materials of demolished temples. This is called the Islamic theology of Iconoclasm.

9. Pakistan was a natural outcome of what and how Islam is taught and preached in mosques. It is a well-established fact that Quran and Islam stress the religious uniqueness and cohesiveness of the Moslem community. This theme is constantly drummed into the brains of the Moslems in sermons delivered in the mosques. Moslem masses who were fed on these sermons enthusiastically embraced the two-nation theory of the Moslem League, because it confirmed the basic teachings of the Quran. Further, the memories of the erstwhile Moslem rule in India, remained alive among the Moslems, and they were reminded of it by the Ulema again and again that having ruled India, Moslems should not allow themselves to be ruled by the Hindu majority.

By concealing and screening information on the Barbaric Havoc of Islam in Indian History, the Brown Sahibs are trying to create a false sense of serenity by constructing a cracker jackbox of thunderstruck falsehood. The Brown Sahibs are also slipping up by failing to realize that they themselves (the Brown Sahibs) are also on the hit list of both Islam and Christianity because in the eyes of both Islam and Christians, the Brown Sahibs are Kafirs and fit only to feed the fires of Hell. At this time, both Islam and Christianity are increasing at a hefty rate, are growing like cancer, and eating away the vitals of Hindu Society. The Brown Sahibs are shutting their eyes to this display of destruction and extinction of Hinduism. The naivety of the Brown Sahibs is nothing short of scandalous. And as the clich'e goes, they are not focussed on the bottom-line. On the other hand, insulting anything related to Hinduism and its cultural traditions, is in their mind, synonymous with Secularism. Many of these Brown Sahibs genuinely believe that insulting Hinduism is a royal road to getting Moslem votes.

10. In 1956, Nehru's Sanskrit Commission had recommended that Sanskrit be made a compulsory subject in all schools in order to preserve the intellectual pre- eminence of the Indian heritage. Before that, in 1927, Gandhi had written that not only Hindus but Moslems also should read Sanskrit because Ram and Krishna were their forefathers too. It must not be forgotten that Sanskrit is the oldest perfect language and contains the richest and the most prolific treasure of knowledge and wisdom.

Walk-out by the Brown Sahibs, from educational meetings designed to consider Sanskrit, Vande Matram, and Saraswati Vandana, are examples of their insulting, abusing, and degrading Hinduism and its various symbols. Anybody who criticizes their anti-Hindu and anti-national rhetoric, they detest and disdain him and paint him saffron. The Brown Sahibs are ready to accept the moral contents of the Quran and the Bible, but are not favorably inclined to accept the Ramayana or Gita. The assaulting and insulting of anything related to Hinduism and its moral tradition is the essence of their degraded secularism. The BJP is trying to reverse this damaging trend by proposing the study of the Vedas and Purans in schools. What all this means is that due to the disposition of pseudo-secularism in India, our Hindu ethos and culture is at the wit and mercy of foreign ideologies.

11. There was a time when Moslems (converted from Hinduism) ruled Hindustan and they used to tell us Hindus: Yes, we will defend you, but you will have to pay us "Jaziya" as required by our Deen-E-Quran. It became normal, therefore, for our Hindus to entrust their daughters and defense to the barbarian Moslem Masters. But times have changed and India is no longer under the jackboots of Islam. Can't we Hindus now stand up for our religion, culture, and rights now? The answer is YES we can, if we decide to, but not if we have the conviction of goats in our religion and in our Hindu people.

In all European countries, that claim to practice secularism, the concept of secularism, never stands in the way of coloring every important occasion with their Christian beliefs, practices, and symbols. All Moslem majority countries are exclusively Islamic. No other religious practices are permitted in Islamic countries. There is no distinction between state and Islamic principles. From Moslem point of view, all other religions are corrupted and their religious books are superseded by Quran. In Islam, the mixture of politics and religion is inextricable. Slaughter, plunder, and looting of Hindus (Kafir Hindus) is permitted and couched in Islamic terms, dividing mankind into Moslems and Kafirs.

In no Islamic or Christian country, are there any special rights for other religions (i.e. non-Islamic or non-Christian religions). They are convinced that Islam and Christianity will dominate the world and guide its destiny. Only in India, are there special rights, special privileges, and special monetary support to the Islamic and Christian minorities, all in the off-color name of secularism. In reality, this is not secularism, as practised anywhere, but minority-ism.

12. What to do about Phony-Liberalism? It should be clear to every rational-thinking Hindu that Hinduism is presently in the anti-Hindu literary siege and is being attacked with campaigns of disinformation war conducted against it by the Phony-Liberal Hindus, Moslems, Christians, and Marxists. It is a battle for the minds of men and we must fight this war to revive the thinking of the Hindu Society. We must challenge the media distortions against us, on TV, Radio, Newspapers, in Schools, every place. Only when the thinking of the Hindu Society itself is altered, will it be able to revitalize itself. Hindus must stop hiding in the veil of neglect and actively, ideologically, and scholarly, challenge the religions of exclusivity (Islam and Christianity) and expose their bone-chilling barbaric record of centuries.

13. Veer Savarkar advised : “Hinduise Politics And Militarise The Hindu”

It is a filthy shame that we Hindus have not taken up this absolutely sound advice. Instead, we have taken up the worthless, rotten, and pre-posterous mumbo jumbo of Gandhi such as:

“Hindu-Moslem Bhai Bhai” and “Sarva Dharma Sambhava” etc etc.

Just consider this:

We are repeatedly told that Hindu-Hindu Unity is impossible but Hindu-Moslem Unity is quite feasible. What kind of rubbish is this? This is the rubbish that is being parcelled out by the Brown Sahibs, who have distanced themselves from Hinduism and have lost all allegiance to Bharat Varsha and her sanctity.

14. Hindus are being driven from hearth and home but Brown Sahibs have nothing to say about that. Hindus are being murdered and persecuted nearly all over the world...in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Burma, Uganda, Fiji, Malaysia, and other places. Phony-Liberal news media of India invents Phony-Liberal terminology "To Explain This Rout Of The Hindu". Hindus killed in Sri Lanka are labelled as "Tamils". Hindus murdered and escaping from Bangladesh are labelled as "Chakmas" and "Refugees" and so on, to confuse the Hindu people. The aim of this Phony-Liberal terminology is to make the persecuted Hindus look like aliens...no business and concern of India, therefore, OK to forget them.

Why do the Hindus take so much Shit from Moslems and Christians? The answer is lack of Hindu Unity and the extremely short memory of the Hindus. And who are these Moslems that are being pampered? These are the same Moslems who used to repeat:

“Mufit Se Liya Hai Pakistan Khoon Se Leynge Hindustan”

Again, it is the lack of Hindu Unity which results in the appeasement of these Worthless Mussalmaans. Why else would the Hindu Communist Traitor eat beef to prove himself a Marxist and his "Pseudo-Secularism" but if someone offers pork (pig-meat) to the Moslem Communist Comrade, the Hindu Communist Comrade opposes it. Why is this kind of falsehood and hypocrisy being thrust upon the Hindu in the guise and guile of Secularism? Because what, in fact, the Brown Sahibs are saying, through charades and hypocrisy of this type, is that "Religion Is An Opium" but only for the Hindus, not for Moslems and Christians. This kind of witless hypocrisy and dis-esteem of the Hindu is most reprehensible and needs to be brought to an end.

15. The outrage of the Hindu is enormous. More than thirty million Hindus have been driven out of Bangladesh. In addition, more than thirty million illegal Moslem infiltrators from Bangladesh have entered India. They have not been deported; instead they have been given ration cards and voting rights by the Brown Sahibs, Marxist Traitors, and other Haram-Khors, who took hefty bribes from the infiltrators. These criminals need to be rounded up, punished, and deported, and the corrupt officials of the Brown Sahib clique need to be made to cough up all the bribes that they have taken.

Because the Hindus were made to flee from Pakistan and Bangladesh, for their dear lives, justice and prudent economics demands that needed equivalent area be snatched from Pakistan and Bangladesh, to settle these Hindu refugees. Don't forget that only 200,000 Palestinian Moslems were uprooted upon the creation of Israel and the demand for their share of land has never ceased. In fact, it has created an International Problem, with incidents of terrorism, car-bombings etc etc… Then why don't thirty million Hindus deserve their share of land and why don't they deserve to be heard? People who regard this demand as "Hindu Fundamentalism" are traitors.

Why does nearly every Hindu shrink in fear at the mention of the two words "Hindu Rashtra?" There are so many fundamentalist Islamic countries and they don't cause any sensation in the mind of any Hindu. Why is "Hindu Rashtra" such a scary nomenclature? What is the problem with the Hindu mind?

16. As stated before, the solution to problems of Hinduism is Hindu Unity. Hindus need to wake up, understand this reality, and get united FAST! Islam's objective has not changed and it is to destabilize and finish off the Dar-Ul-Harb of Kafir Hindu India, as laid out in the Quran. What are our Brown Sahibs doing in the face of such dire challenges? Here is an example of their response:

Every Hindu pilgrim has to cough up Rs 10 while visiting any of his shrines but the Moslems going to Saudi Arabia for Haj get a subsidy of crores of rupees from the government of India. This glaring disparity in the treatment of the Hindus and the Moslems, shames the manhood of every Hindu and he wonders how long he will have to take this kind of Shit?

Simply put, it is plain that traitors posing as Seculars, Liberals, and Anti- Communals are bent upon eradicating Hinduism from Bharat Varsha. These Traitors need to be exposed for what they really are...malicious and perverse, anti-Hindu double-dealing traitors.

17. To sum and recapitulate: Savarkar's one-liner is a timely solution for the problems of Hinduism and is repeated here for emphasis: Hinduise The Politics And Militarize The Hindu.

O God! Can you keep me alive till then!!!!!!!!!!

I am sorry but the fact is, as said by some one, we have become a community of "Havans and Bhavans". You will find people from our community thronging havans and bhawans and discussing trivial issues, which have no relevance to the present situation and condition of ours. Tell the same people to meet again but for greater issues like our safe and honourable return of ours that too on our terms and conditions, the ensemble is gone or gets vanished in thin air. Worse, you find these very people talking about the situation of KP's and the so-called solutions of our woes being discussed over cup of teas and snacks. This is the attitude of many of us and we think, in this way, we will be very soon going back to Kashmir. I can only laugh it out, that too loudly. We have become too materialistic and have developed narrow tunnel mindset as well as vision. Having said so, doesn't mean we ought not to earn and be affluent. This is our right, as we have had enough of poverty that too forcibly thrust on us. But the need of the hour is to start working for the community, be it at individual or collective levels. Some thing visible has to be started and there upon disseminated and/or percolated in all directions.

Gone are the days when we, KP's, were having a broader outlook, based on ground realities, a vision and a road map. Today, we are disintegrated as well as disillusioned, that too, a lot, for reasons obvious. We are acting exactly like the crabs, who don't allow the other crab to come out of the basket to set himself free. The time, I would say rather high time, has come that we should shed our inhibitions, age old thrusted upon slave mentality, keeping our personal differences apart and come out openly with 1. Suggestions, ideas (I would like out of box ideas), 2. Our goals, immediate and long term, 3. Ways and means to achieve the same, 4. Chalking out a plan for finances, this is of utmost importance, 5. Linking up with other Hindu groups / organisations, who are also facing many problems, not exactly of our kind, but similar to that of ours, 6. Clubbing of all social and political organizations under one “Mega Banner”, which in turn will helps us have one voice, which will say, in lay mans parlance, talk, walk, eat, read, speak, sleep "KP, KP & KP". (These are few options which have come up in my mind and later on other options can be added/incorporated.)

Is it that difficult, when many among us have attained so many heights in the corporate, social, technological, arts, et all worlds? When we can do the above, what is stopping us to start a meaningful, long-term, and well-planned with well defined road map and milestones set, “Fight” for our return to our age old mother-land. I am of firm belief that KP's are second to none. History is witness. We were on zenith at social, political, economic, scientific, fine arts, philosophy, etc., etc, before the onset of the Evil Cult. World is coming back to us, acknowledging our age old inventions, discoveries, experience based only on hard core in-depth analysis done by our fore-fathers, whom we, unfortunately, don't even care to remember and forget about remembering their contributions, which they made not only for us, but for the whole of humanity. Our fore-fathers had a broader vision and outlook and hence worked for whole of whole of the humanity because of the fact that they already knew about this world and how it works. They knew there is only one "Param-Atma", which is supreme & above all and He/She is kind and gracious enough to keep everyone under His/Her “Chatra Chaya”, whatever the circumstances are/be. It is “He/She”, who commands us, assigns everyone of us our responsibilities and after performing our duties (Death), He/She allows us to get merged within Him/Her because of the fact that We are Him/Her and Him/Her are We.

We have to start the fight and the fight won't be easy at all. Evil forces in the shape of Evil Cults (I hope you understand what I mean to say) will always be after us to foil our plans. It will be a long long fight, which we have to fight, not only for ourselves but for whole of the humanity. And it won't be an ordinary fight. It will be a fight between Good and Evil. Our fight will set/lay foundation stone for the long fight, which will be fought over a period of time. We will have to make sacrifices and those sacrifices will be worthwhile. We, our children and maybe our grandchildren may not live to see the new light full of life, promises and what not. Imagine the scene, when the fight/war of Good over Evil is won! How our future generations will feel elated and free. River of real joy and life will flow all over the world. Ponder Over It.

Godsegiri v/s Gandhigiri

Godse's self-prepared defense in court:

Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession. I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other. 

I have read the speeches and writings of Dadabhai Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England, France, America and' Russia. Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.


All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well-being of all India, one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.


Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji's influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day.

In fact, honour, duty and love of one's own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor.

It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action. 

In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life.

In condemning history's towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to them.

The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every thing; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma's infallibility. 'A Satyagrahi can never fail' was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible. Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster.


Gandhi's pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India. It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India, Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect; it is spoken, but not written.

It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma's sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims, he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India. His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used.

The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus. 

From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson.

The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League member’s right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi's infatuation for them.

Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork. 

The Congress which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian Territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947.

Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls 'freedom' and 'peaceful transfer of power'. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called 'freedom won by them with sacrifice' - whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country - which we consider a deity of worship - my mind was filled with direful anger.


One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan, there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.


Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah's iron will and proved to be powerless.


Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan. People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building. After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House.


I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots.


I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi. I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preaching’s and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi's persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims. 


I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.

The Smear Campaign

Lot of muck is being spread against me (Ravi Raina) and without going through the real events, which has sparked the discussion; people have started a smear campaign against me, whom people are labelling as illogical person and what not. After a serious thought, I found it necessary to clear the picture, as I am finding that people are still confused and have no idea, what made the discussion start.

Well here it goes.

After joining KPNetwork, I searched for other KP groups and I came across Voice of Kashmiri Pandits. The name in itself was appealing and convincing and on this basis I decided to join so that I could get to know the views of other KP’s in the belief that it must be a serious kind of group. But, I was disappointed to know that this group turned to be weird to me on the very first visit of mine. It was a huge disappointment. Anyway, visiting of mine continued for some days and during these times, vibes were getting stronger and stronger. Not able to make anything out of vibes emanating from within (which actually created lot of uneasiness in me), I decided to leave the group and so I did. After couple of days, for unknown reasons, I once again joined the VOKP group and kept on watching what all is coming up in the so-called group called Voice of Kashmiri Pandits, which in reality is and should have been named as “Voice of Sarika Raina”.

There was “good mornings” and “shero-shayari” going on for whole of the day and people seemed to be enjoying. Humiliation of KP community and degradation was going on. Admin, Sarika Raina wasn’t at all sisvurbed or perturbed b these happenings and I started to have a strong feeling about Sarika Raina being a fake or even one amoung our enemies, whose main aim is to keep glubbile KP oung ones bus with unnecessary and irrelevant topic’s.During this process, on Sunday 16^th July, 2011, a post appeared wherein two links were given (sorry I don’t remember the name of person). Out of curiosity, I checked both the links and was surprised to know that both links are of same person and the person in question was Sarika Raina a.k.a. Henal Sharma. After learning this, people started to ask her who she was and it was natural. As the questions were coming up, someone else raised a question of how a person with the name of Yousuf Shah Chak was allowed to be part of the group. I also visited the profile of the profile.

Ghosh! It was horrendous, disgraceful, humiliating and tantamount to adding salt to our, already soar, wounds. His photo gallery was full of anti-India and anti-KP’s. That was enough. This could not be tolerated. She had to be explain it. Dear Friends, if you check the profile of Yousuf Shah Chak, I am sure, you will feel more offended, than I was. You are requested to check the profile of Yousuf Shah Chak.

A Screen Shot of his page is below.

If any KP won’t get annoyed or loose one’s temper,then in my view, he/she is not a KP at all. His pix in the profile is saying that Kashmir is already an independent Islamic State and we need a “PASSPORT” to visit that place. How disgusting and humiliating? How dare she entertain a person like yusuf Shah Chak? My doubts came true. Is Sarika Raina really Sarika Raina a.k.a. Hetal Sharma or someone else from our enemies under the skin of a sheep? This angered me a lot. Went back to VOKP page and started to ask question about her identity, alongwith others, as their was no point in asking her about yusuf Shah Chak as the truth had come into the limelight. Replies, which came from her, were irrelevant and defeated one’s and kept objecting on asking our questions about her identity and intentions. No direct reply was coming. And in the meantime, I once again visited the page of our enemy. I was astonished at the photo gallery being put off of public viewing. It didn’t took me a moments time to understand that she is not a KP. I could see a direct link between her and Yousuf Shah Chak. How come photo gallery was removed from public viewing that too within such a short period of time? There was a direct link and communication between her and yusuf Shah Chak beyond doubt.

I went back to VOKP page and started once again putting questions to her and as usual, no reply came. Whatever came that was irrelevant? In the meantime, I found that all posts relating to the exposé were deleted, thus creating a situation as if she is being targeted only for having more than one profile. In the meanwhile she kept introducing her friends as a support group and began mudslinging and using defamatory language. I could get a chance to expose her completely as my membership got deleted, hence could not put forward my point. Anway, I am sure, she will have to pay the price for this act of her’s as I firmly believe in power of Supreme Power. “Bhagwan ke ghar daer hoti hai, par andaer nahi hoti”.

People may have started to pose a question, why there is no pix of mine in my profile of FaceBook. Well, I consider myself a faceless human being, who does not matter at all to anyone. Be it social, political, bureaucratic and whatever. I am always being treated as an alien, wherever I go. However, true friend and well wisher I become of the society at large, I am being rejected. But that is not stopping me from being an Indian and vouching for India. I am First an Indian Hindu and Last a Indian Hindu. Muje to nahi hai, kya aap ko shak hai.

My intention is not to degrade, demean or belittle anyone. But facts have to be brought in public domain, which may cause loss of reputation to someone. That is why; wise people have well said “Think hundred times before you say”. 

What a sad way to start a blog?

Note: Kindly discuss this issue on this forum only and not on KPNetwork in Facebook. Let us maintain decorum. Your comments, of whatever type, are welcome.